I agree about the audience. I should have better defined what I meant by noob.
I also particularly like the idea about dual commentary. There are quite a few videos I have seen that do that very well.
Another slightly different angle on that which I saw was done by Todd Arnold and David Eisentein do on RPT. Those two are chalk and cheese as far as style goes. So David made a video and then Todd dubbed other commentary over the top of it. The idea was to show specific spots where TAG and LAG thinking part ways.
Amongst ourselves there is probably not such a huge discrepancy in style [although we all know Richard is kinda tight ;-) ]But even still adding a second layer of audio analysis even if not done concurrently live, might add to the depth of content, since two sets of ideas go into the one video.
As usual, we need advice from Marty about capital and still about other monetisation issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment